With the new Trump administration on the horizon, many survivors of child and adult sexual abuse, as well as advocates, are bracing for potential shifts in victims’ rights policies. The last Trump administration brought significant changes to Title IX regulations. Including narrowing definitions of sexual harassment and adjusting support for survivors on campuses. So, what could a new term mean for the rights and protections of abuse survivors?
Prior Trump Administration Hints At Victims’ Rights Approach
In the past, Trump’s administration enacted significant changes under Title IX that aimed to balance protections for accused individuals with those for survivors. Critics argue these regulations made it more challenging for victims to come forward, as institutions were required to hold live hearings and allow cross-examinations, which some advocates felt could retraumatize survivors.
Many victims’ rights organizations, including the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence (NAESV), voiced concern about these changes, stating that they placed an undue burden on survivors and discouraged reporting. If these regulations are reinstated or expanded, advocates may push back, calling for policies prioritizing trauma-informed practices and simplifying the reporting process for survivors rather than creating additional obstacles. Recently, the Biden administration reversed many of those regulations and increased protections for LGBTQ people. Many fear that Trump will roll back these provisions and attempt to eliminate compliance with Title IX by sending it to the states for enforcement and governance.
Trump’s administration also created the first-ever White House position focused solely on combating human trafficking and signed nine pieces of bipartisan legislation to combat human trafficking, both domestically and internationally.
Access to Funding and Support Services for Survivors
A key concern among victims’ rights organizations is how funding for support services will fare under a new administration. During Trump’s previous term, funding for the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) and the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) saw increases. Still, the long-term effects on budget allocations and how funds are distributed to local organizations remain a question mark given Trump’s promises to eliminate certain aspects of government and significantly decrease funding. Groups like the National Organization for Victim Assistance (NOVA) have stressed that federal support is essential to sustain the crisis centers and shelters that many survivors rely on.
If a future administration shifts focus or reduces funding, it could lead to cuts in essential services that provide immediate and long-term support for victims, such as counseling, housing, and legal advocacy.
Federal and State-Level Protections for Child Victims
Protecting children from sexual abuse is a bipartisan issue, but the approach to this protection can vary widely. Past legislation, like the Protect Our Children Act, received broad support. Many student activists across the country have vocalized concern for survivors of sexual abuse. For example, some worry that a conservative administration might limit support for preventative educational programs that address child abuse.
On the other hand, there is potential for bipartisan support to strengthen penalties against child sexual abusers and human trafficking. Programs that focus on rehabilitating and supporting survivors may expand. Organizations and survivors alike will be watching closely to see whether the administration will uphold and develop protective measures for children.
Advocating for Continued Progress in Victims’ Rights
While a new administration may bring uncertainty, advocacy groups are ensuring that victims’ rights remain a priority. Organizations like RAINN and the Joyful Heart Foundation continue to push for policies that protect survivors. Advocacy for federal legislation supporting trauma-informed care, improved survivor protections, and secure funding for support services remain strong.
In times of transition, it’s essential to keep the conversation going and to hold those in power accountable. Survivors and advocates must remain vigilant and united in the call for policies supporting healing and justice.